Sunday, February 26, 2017

Violent, Ignorant Bullies Need A Cause To Feel Superior

Dozens of headstones toppled at Philadelphia Jewish Cemetery

More than 100 headstones have been damaged at Philadelphia cemetery.  Aaron Mallin discovered the damage Sunday morning when he arrived at Mount Carmel Cemetery to visit his father's grave. Police said that they received a call from a man that three of his relatives' headstones had been knocked over and damaged.

"The cemetery was inspected and approximately 100 additional headstones were found to be knocked over," apparently sometime after dark Saturday, a police spokeswoman said in a statement. A criminal mischief-institutional vandalism investigation will be conducted by the police Northeast Detectives Division, she said.

"I'm hoping it was maybe just some drunk kids. But the fact that there's so many, it leads one to think it could have been targeted," Mallin told the station. "It's just very heartbreaking."

Stacy Silver told Philly.com that the tombstones of her mother and great-grandmother had been toppled to the ground.
"Your stomach just drops," Silver said. "I mean it's just horrible." 

Police did not say whether they had any suspects in the case or whether they knew of a motive. 

"It's criminal. This is beyond vandalism," Capt. Shawn Thrush told Philly.com. "It's beyond belief."

The Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia lists Mount Carmel as a Jewish cemetery in northeastern Philadelphia. Philly.com reported that the cemetery contains tombstones dating back to at least the mid-1800s.

The damage comes less than a week after a Jewish cemetery in suburban St. Louis reported more than 150 cemetery headstones were vandalized and toppled over. The Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia said late Sunday that it would open an online mailbox to begin raising money for repairs.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
**************************************
In honor and remembrance for the quiet lives and sacrifice of many persecuted and innocent Jews, whose memory does not deserve this hateful, violent and ignorant act of mean-spirited bullies. Granny Annie's Politic Cafe will lovingly serve a comforting bowl of hot soup. These bowls of soup are meant to comfort the undeserved pain of hurting souls. This is an era of confusion under Trump's Administration that quietly embraces the ignorant, violent acts of people lashing out at innocent victims... with indifference. This is the kind of skewed American values, I grew up learning at home was morally and spiritually wrong. I pray it will heal and nourish your bodies. I pray you will eat in peace and safety your fill... I pray it will comfort all hurting hearts with hope for a better America, and remove hate and evil far from our homes and communities.

**************************************
P.S. Today on 02/27/2017 the White House has said during a press conference that Pres. Trump does not condone the vandalism to Jewish cemeteries and feels that the vandalism was a terrible thing and condemned the acts of vandalism.
***************************************
Today's lunch recipe:

                           Granny Annie's Politic Cafe Chicken Soup
1 lb. chicken 
2 stalks chopped celery
1 chopped onion
1 tbsp. dried parsley
1 tbsp. Kosher Mediterranean Sea salt
1 tbsp. coarse ground pepper
1 tbsp. minced garlic
1 pkg. of Reames 24 oz. Home style frozen egg noodles
1 stick of butter
2 quarts of chicken stock
1/4 cup chives


Use large stock pot and medium heat to melt stick of butter. Then add onion and celery to cook till soft. Add meat, salt, pepper, garlic and chicken stock. Stir all ingredients and add parsley. Bring to a boil and add frozen egg noodles and stir for 5 minutes. Place lid on pot and reduce heat to low setting and simmer for 30-45 minutes. Serve soup garnished with chives sprinkled on top. 

Mazel Tov! Boner Appertite!.  


Saturday, February 25, 2017

Soup for Trumps "Enemies of the State" (All you leakers out there)

The New York Times
By Julie Hirschfeld and Michael M. Grynbaum
Feb. 24, 2017

Trump Intensifies His Attacks on Journalists and Condemns F.B.I. ‘Leakers’


WASHINGTON — President Trump turned the power of the White House against the news media on Friday, escalating his attacks on journalists as “the enemy of the people” and berating members of his own F.B.I. as “leakers” who he said were putting the nation at risk.
Hours after the speech, as if to demonstrate Mr. Trump’s determination to punish reporters whose coverage he dislikes, Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, barred journalists from The New York Times and several other news organizations from attending his daily briefing, a highly unusual breach of relations between the White House and its press corps.
The moves underscored the degree to which Mr. Trump and members of his inner circle are eager to use the prerogatives of the presidency to undercut those who scrutinize him, dismissing negative stories as lies and confining press access at the White House to a few chosen news organizations considered friendly. The Trump White House has also vowed new efforts to punish leakers.
Reporters from The Associated Press and Time magazine, who were set to be allowed in, chose not to attend the briefing in protest of the White House’s actions. The Washington Post did not send a reporter to the session.
“Nothing like this has ever happened at the White House in our long history of covering multiple administrations of different parties,” Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The Times, said in a statement. “We strongly protest the exclusion of The New York Times and the other news organizations. Free media access to a transparent government is obviously of crucial national interest.”
************************************************************************
To honor the patriotic intentions and spirit of the FBI on a cold winter night, Granny Annie has decided to serve her beloved friends, family and countrymen a real heart warming dish of loving soup for their souls. Tonight's receipe:


                          Granny Annie's Politic Cafe "Leekers Soup"

4 chopped Leeks
4 large chopped Yukon Gold potatoes
1 cup of chopped Cauliflower
1 cup of chopped Butternut Squash
8 cups of Chicken stock
1 cup of Heavy Cream
2 tblsp. of Olive Oil
4 tblsp. Butter
1 tblsp. minced Garlic
1 tblsp. of Mediterranean Sea salt
1 tblsp. of coarse ground Pepper
1/4 cup of chopped Chives

Chop off end roots of Leeks and remove outside thick green leaves and wash remaining leaves of Leeks well to remove any sandy grit present from growing in outside soil. Use large non-stick pot and place butter and olive oil in bottom of pan with heat at moderate  temperature. Chop all Leeks into 1 inch long sized chops and add to cooking pot. Add potatoes chopped to bite size and cook for 15 minutes. Then add cauliflower, butternut squash, chicken stock, garlic, salt, pepper and cook for 45 minutes. Remove pot from heat and use either a blender or a hand mixer to make a creamy soup. Lastly add heavy cream and mix in soup. Garnish soup with chives. 

This soup is dedicated to all the patriotic "Leakers", who resist toxic regimes and support the value of democracy and the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. 

                                                "Boner Appertite!"     
                                        

Trump and Hitler Share RSVP


Washington Post:

Trump will not attend the White House correspondents’ dinner




  
President Trump will not attend the White House correspondents’ dinnerafter a campaign and early tenure where he continually battled with the press.
Trump announced his decision on Twitter late Saturday afternoon. The dinner is scheduled for April 29.Shortly after Trump’s tweet, the president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, which sponsors the annual event, said in an email that the dinner would take place even without Trump’s attendance.
“[The dinner] has been and will continue to be a celebration of the First Amendment and the important role played by an independent news media in a healthy republic,” WHCA president Jeff Mason said. “We look forward to shining a spotlight at the dinner on some of the best political journalism of the past year and recognizing the promising students who represent the next generation of our profession.”
Since Trump’s inauguration, calls to boycott the annual event have grown louder amid his increasingly fraught relationship with the press. Throughout his campaign, Trump regularly lashed out at the press, singling out news outlets for being “dishonest” and at one point barring The Washington Post from covering his campaign events. Since his election, he has accused certain media outlets of publishing “fake news.” Earlier this month, the tense relationship reached a boil when Trump called the media “the enemy of the American People.”
In response to concerns, the White House Correspondents’ Association released a statement earlier this month, saying the dinner would take place. Vanity Fair, the New Yorker and Bloomberg canceled their parties, which had usually drawn celebrities. Comedian Samantha Bee announced in January that she was planning an alternative event on the same night for “journalists and non-irritating celebrities from around the world.” (Its tentative name: “Not the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.”)
Questions about whether the dinner was appropriate existed before Trump took office. The event is an annual gathering of journalists and the people they cover, typically headlined by the sitting president. The White House Correspondents’ Association awards $100,000 in scholarships at its annual dinner, according to its website, and recently started a mentoring program that pairs working journalists with journalism students.
The annual dinner began in 1921, and Calvin Coolidge became the first president to attend the dinner in 1924. In 1978, Jimmy Carter declined to attend, citing exhaustion. First lady Rosalynn Carter and Vice President Walter Mondale also didn’t show up that year, according to The Washington Post’s Paul Farhi.
In 1981, President Ronald Reagan managed to deliver remarks by phone even though he was at Camp David recovering from an assassination attempt.
“If I could give you just one little bit of advice, when somebody tells you to get in a car quick, do it,” Reagan said to laughter.
Trump has attended the dinner before.In 2011, then-president Barack Obama roasted Trump at the dinner — five minutes of jokes directed at the man who had raised questions about whether Obama was born in the United States.
“No one is happier, no one is prouder to put this birth certificate matter to rest than the Donald,” said Obama, who ultimately released his birth certificate. “That’s because he can finally get back to focusing on the issues that matter, like: Did we fake the moon landing? What really happened in Roswell? And where are Biggie and Tupac?”At the time, Obama joked about Trump’s experience to lead the nation.
“All kidding aside, obviously, we all know about your credentials and breadth of experience,” Obama said. “For example, no seriously, just recently in an episode of ‘Celebrity Apprentice,’ at the steakhouse, the men’s cooking team did not impress the judges from Omaha Steaks. And there was a lot of blame to go around but you, Mr. Trump, recognized that the problem was a lack of leadership and so ultimately you didn’t blame Little John or Meatloaf — you fired Gary Busey. And these are the kinds of decisions that would keep me up at night. Well-handled, sir. Well-handled.”
Obama ended his roast talking about the change a President Donald Trump would bring to the White House.
Then he flashed a picture of the then-hypothetical Trump White house, emblazoned with pink neon and gold columns, with bikini-clad women relaxing in the fountain outside.
*********************************************************************
It is not surprising that Pres. Trump's decision would probably have been shared by Adolph Hitler in 1933.

Will Good People Remain Silent?

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent".

Edmund Burke Quotes - BrainyQuote

https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/e/edmund_burke.html

Perez wins DNC chairmanship

Dictatorship 101: How Dictators Come To Power


By Patrick Gillespie CNN  
'Mexico has never been so threatened' Some marchers wore shirts that read "Nasty Woman Keep Fighting.""We are sending a message to Donald Trump: No wall. No immigrant raids. No aggression to Mexico," said Denise Dresser, a professor in Mexico City who made 350 of the shirts with donations. "Mexico has never been so threatened and never have we had a government so incompetent."
It's only been 36 days in the Trump Presidential Administration for him to have single-handedly alienated and insulted Mexico, Australia and Sweden from America's informal list of friends.

CNN reports that Professor Denise Dresser has made 350 shirts for the Sunday Feb. 12th., 2017 protest in Mexico City. Based on protests, many Mexican citizens believe that Trump is insane and are not alone in that fear around the world and in America.

Why has White House Chief of Staff Reince Preibus tried to get the FBI intelligence top officials to cover up the truth about Russian contact/connections to the Trump Administration? Why does Trump want to skew the truth about immigrant terrorists countries of origin when most of the terrorists we know about, came from Saudi Arabia, instead of the banned countries on Trumps list?

Why is Trump now barring major media outlets from White House Press Briefings? Why is he barring the following news media outlets:

The Guardian
CNN
BBC
New York Times

Is it because they all have posted articles that criticized Trump?
*******************************************************************************



FEB 5, 2013 @ 08:00 AM 

How Dictators Come To Power In A Democracy

Contributor Jim Powell @Forbes Magazine

Dictatorships are often unexpected.  They have arisen among prosperous, educated and cultured people who seemed safe from a dictatorship – in Europe, Asia and South America.
Consider Germany, one of the most paradoxical and dramatic cases.
During the late 19th century, it was widely considered to have the best educational system in the world.  If any educational system could inoculate people from barbarism, surely Germany would have led the way.  It had early childhood education -- kindergarten.  Secondary schools emphasized cultural training.  Germans developed modern research universities.  Germans were especially distinguished for their achievements in science – just think of Karl Benz who invented the gasoline-powered automobile, Rudolf Diesel who invented the compression-ignition engine, Heinrich Hertz who proved the existence of electromagnetic waves, Wilhelm Conrad Rőntgen who invented x-rays, Friedrich August Kekulé who developed the theory of chemical structure, Paul Ehrlich who produced the first medicinal treatment for syphilis and, of course, theoretical physicist Albert Einstein.  It’s no wonder so many American scholars went to German universities for their degrees during the 19th century.
After World War I, German university enrollment soared.  By 1931, it reached 120,000 versus a maximum of  73,000 before the war.  Government provided full scholarships for poor students with ability.  As one chronicler reported, a scholarship student “pays no fees at the university, his textbooks are free, and on most purchases which he makes, for clothing, medical treatment, transportation and tickets to theaters and concerts, he receives substantial reductions in price, and a student may get wholesome food sufficient to keep body and soul together.”
While there was some German anti-Semitic agitation during the late 19th century, Germany didn’t seem the most likely place for it to flourish.  Russia, after all, had pogroms – anti-Jewish rioting and persecution – for decades.  Russia’s Bolshevik regime dedicated itself to hatred – Karl Marx’s hatred for the “bourgeoisie” whom he blamed for society’s ills.  Lenin and his successor Stalin pushed that philosophy farther, exterminating the so-called “rich” who came to include peasants with one cow.
Why, then, did the highly educated Germans embrace a lunatic like Adolf Hitler?  The short answer is that bad policies caused economic, military and political crises – chow time for tyrants.  German circumstances changed for the worse, and when people become angry enough or desperate enough, sometimes they’ll support crazies who would never attract a crowd in normal circumstances.
Like the other belligerents, Germans had entered World War I with the expectation that they would win and recoup their war costs by making the losers pay.  The German government led their people to believe they were winning, so everybody was shocked when the truth came out.  Then U.S. President Woodrow Wilson gave a speech outlining his high-minded “14 Points,” leading the Germans to expect a peace negotiation.  But the British and the French – America’s principal allies -- were determined to avenge their losses, and vindictive terms were forced on the Germans.  They felt betrayed and humiliated.  Germany’s principal military commanders realized that whoever signed the armistice would be hated, so they resigned and let a civilian official sign it (he was subsequently assassinated).  As a result, the Weimar republic, Germany’s fragile democracy, was immediately discredited.
Hitler was among those agitating against the Weimar government.  He joined the German Workers’ Party that, in February 1920, became the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP) – later shortened to Nazi.  It offered a witches’ brew of nationalism, socialism, anti-Semitism and anti-capitalism.  The German historian Oswald Spengler influenced early Nazis with his idea of “Prussian socialism.”
Hitler’s main talent seemed to be as a speech maker, so he began giving speeches that appealed to Germans embittered and disillusioned by the outcome of the war.  He denounced Jews, capitalists and other alleged villains, vowing to rebuild German greatness.
Historian Ian Kershaw observed that “Without a lost war, revolution, and a pervasive sense of national humiliation, Hitler would have remained a nobody.”
Then came the inflation crisis.  Victorious Allies demanded that Germany pay steep reparations, apparently without giving much thought about how the Germans would get the money for that. Trade restrictions made it harder for German companies to earn money through exports.  European tariffs generally tripled and were as much as 800% higher than prewar levels.
The German government defaulted on its reparations agreement.  Determined to extract reparations from the Germans, in January 1923 the French sent troops into the Ruhr where much of German industry was located.  The German government responded by subsidizing those who pursued passive resistance against the French.  Consequently, German budget deficits soared.
By itself, reparations would have been daunting, but Germany also had a financially stressed-out welfare state.  Almost 90 percent of German government spending went for a big bureaucracy, social programs, money-losing nationalized businesses and other subsidies -- a portfolio of obligations uncomfortably familiar to us.  The German government subsidized municipalities, much as U.S. states are begging the federal government for bailouts now.  Germany had a troubled government-run pension system like our Social Security.  The German government provided health insurance for millions of people.  There were German government programs for 1.5 million disabled veterans.  The government lavished subsidies on the arts.  There were government-run theaters and opera houses.  Government-owned railroads lost money.  The German government even operated factories producing margarine and sausages, which lost money.
The German central bank began printing stupendous quantities of paper money to pay for all this.  At the peak of the inflation in late 1923, only 1.3 percent of German government spending was covered by tax revenue.  The result was that in less than five years prices soared 100 billion-fold.
Inflation harmed everybody to one degree or another.  Many bank deposits were devalued to nothing.  Historian Gerald D. Feldman reported that gangs of unemployed coal miners plundered the countryside, because farmers refused to trade their produce for worthless paper money.  The government enacted rent controls that limited the ability of landlords to recover their costs and discouraged developers from building more apartments.  So cities borrowed from foreign lenders to build housing that lost money.  Libraries and museums couldn’t maintain their collections because of inflation.  Much scientific research became financially impossible, too.
Historian Konrad Heiden reported, “On Friday afternoons in 1923, long lines of manual and white-collar workers waited outside the pay-windows of German factories, department stores, banks and offices.  Each received a bag full of paper notes.  According to the figures inscribed on them, the paper notes amounted to seven hundred thousand or five hundred million, or three hundred and eighty billion, or eighteen trillion marks – the figures rose from month to month, then from week to week, finally from day to day.  People dashed to the nearest food stores where lines had already formed.  When they reached the stores, a pound of sugar, for example, might have been obtainable for two million marks; but by the time they came to the counter all they could get for two million marks was a half-pound.  Everybody scrambled for things that would keep until the next pay-day.”
People employed in the private sector were enraged when unionized government employees – who carried out the government’s disastrous economic policies -- succeeded in having their salaries pre-paid, so they could convert the currency into goods before the currency depreciated further.  The publication Soziale Praxis reported: “It seems significant to us that public opinion is now gradually turning against the civil service to an extent that gives great concern.  How much hostility is daily directed against that portion of the employed German people with civil service status is shown by the press and also even by those parties which previously supported the civil service and now press for a reduction of the civil service.”
Hitler gave speeches appealing to those he called “starving billionaires” who had billions of paper marks but couldn’t afford a loaf of bread.  Altogether, during the inflation, Hitler recruited some 50,000 Nazis and became a political force to reckon with.  Economist Constantino Bresciani-Turroni called Hitler “the foster child of the inflation.”


To be sure, he attempted a coup that failed (November 8, 1923), and he was imprisoned.  But he retained his key followers and wrote his venomous memoir Mein Kampf that became the Nazi bible.
During the late 1920s, the German economy began to recover, and there was less interest in the Nazis.  In the 1928 Reichstag (legislature) elections, they won only 2.6% of the vote.
If good times had continued, Hitler might have been forgotten.  He needed another crisis for a shot at gaining political power.
The crisis came as a succession of misguided policies created obstacles to enterprise and brought on the Great Depression.  The government promoted deflation.  It fixed prices at above-market levels that discouraged consumers from buying, and it fixed wages at above-market levels that discouraged employers from hiring.  government-sanctioned cartels restricted competition.  High taxes made it harder for people to save and invest.  High tariffs throttled trade.  When German producers were able to export goods, they had difficulty collecting payment because of exchange controls.  All these policies made it harder for the economy to grow.
Moreover, German banks were vulnerable, since they hadn’t fully recovered from the inflation that had wiped out a substantial portion of their capital and left them dependent on short-term foreign deposits that could be withdrawn.
As the number of unemployed went up, more Germans voted for the Nazis, and the number of Nazi members went up again.
Hitler maintained non-stop agitation for power.  He travelled constantly, giving speeches throughout Germany.  He wanted his opponents destroyed, so he demonized them.  He accused them of being traitors.  Two Nazi paramilitary organizations, the S.A. and S.S., launched bloody attacks on his opponents.  This attracted more thugs who liked violence and were good at it.
Every night, there were Nazi rallies and marches. Hitler’s henchmen promoted him by publishing a Nazi magazine, distributing Nazi records and promoting Nazi movies.
They became the largest political organization in Germany, and by January 30, 1933, with the help of a little blackmail, Hitler emerged as Germany’s chancellor – the head of government.  He proceeded to consolidate unlimited power before anybody realized what was happening.
We should understand that Hitler didn’t take over a small government with an effective separation of enumerated, delegated and limited powers.  He took over a large welfare state.  It had been created by the autocratic chancellor Otto von Bismarck, it expanded rapidly during World War I and gained total control of the economy.  War-related private businesses were turned into government bureaucracies.  The government shut down private businesses that officials considered unnecessary.  There was forced labor, and nobody could change jobs without government permission.  For the first time, this “war socialism” showed the world what a socialist economy would look like, and it became a model for Lenin and other communist theoreticians.  The Allies directed the dismantling of the German war machine, but a government-run economy substantially survived.
Although Hitler echoed Soviet-style central economic planning with a Four Year Plan, his method was suffocating regulation rather than outright expropriation.  There was nominal private ownership but government control.  He dealt with unemployment by introducing forced labor for both men and women.  Government control of the economy made it virtually impossible for anyone to seriously threaten his regime. Hitler added secret police, death camps and another war machine.
The German educational system, which had inspired so many American progressives, played a major role in all this.  During the previous century, the government grained complete control of schools and universities, and their top priority was teaching obedience.  The professorial elite promoted collectivism.  The highest calling was working for the government.  In 1919, sociologist Max Weber reported that “The honor of the civil servant is vested in his ability to execute conscientiously the order of superior authorities.”
Lessons for us today:
·         Bad economic policies and foreign policies can cause crises that have dangerous political consequences.
·         Politicians commonly demand arbitrary power to deal with a national emergency and restore order, even though underlying problems are commonly caused by bad government policies.
·         In hard times, many people are often willing to go along with and support terrible things that would be unthinkable in good times.
·         Those who dismiss the possibility of a dictatorial regime in America need to consider possible developments that could make our circumstances worse and politically more volatile than they are now – like runaway government spending, soaring taxes, more wars, inflation and economic collapse.
·         Aspiring dictators sometimes give away their intentions by their evident desire to destroy opponents.
·         There’s no reliable way to prevent bad or incompetent people from gaining power.
·         A political system with a separation of powers and checks & balances – like the U.S. Constitution – does make it more difficult for one branch of government to dominate the others.
·         Ultimately, liberty can be protected only if people care enough to fight for it, because everywhere governments push for more power, and they never give it up willingly.
Jim Powell’s next book will be "The Fight For Liberty, Crucial Lessons From Liberty’s Greatest Champions Of The Last 2,000 Years."  He’s a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute.


Today’s lunch menu in honor of our friends on the other side of the wall is a Mexican favorite world-wide, the ubiquitous “TACO”!!! First, comes the all-important ingredients:
                    Granny Annie’s Politic Café Local Taco Bell

                                            Boner Appertite!!!